I would ASK ANYONE reading this to just take a FEW MINUTES and vist NASA's DAWN MISSION Photo site.

Search for this photo (above) PIA19576_hires.

SAVE it onto your computer and then OPEN it up, then using your ZOOM function you should see this...

This small object up there close to that crater at the top of Ceres (as seen here in the photo above) displaying a defined, shaped object (looking very much like a Rover type? do you not think?) and you should now be able to see that this object is sitting up (off the surface in 3D, NOT flat!) and is showing a SHADOW! from this object down on to the surface of Ceres (it can be seen to the back and to the left hand side of it)

Appears to have something extending from it at the top? what? I don't know?

Now hopefully if some of you have taken the time to discover this for themselves then hopefully you might agree that some EXTRAORDINARY has been discovered? and you might just see that despite what NASA has stated (and believe me I hate to go against what the mighty NASA have said but they do have previous right? Ice Crystals??? really?) this does NOT appear to be an artifact...How can it be such a thing?

Look at the photo as a whole and a tiny artefact shows up right up there like this??? (and on many other photo's in different areas of the photographs!!!) and yet when zoomed in it ACTUALLY appears to look like a ROVER type!...I ask you WHAT ARE THE ODDS of this occurring? artifacts (certainly the one's I know of and have seen are larger than this (on the whole) and do not have definition, they tend to be blurred pixilated errors or light errors with no real defined shape...this HAS a SHAPE!!! do you folks NOT think?) and some as in the case here have SHADOWS!
Artifacts do not cast Shadows! an artefact is an ERROR! it will not cast a shadow of an error!

I may be Mr Average Joe but I am NO FOOL and this has a feel of cover-up about it (and I do hate that word, fun though it may be to some)

Take a look at this photo and the numerous others (it's funny how this artifact looks to have the same defined, shaped and sized object in them ALL isn't it?) on photographs taken at different times upon different areas of Ceres.

And now a WANTS AD from me...

WANTED...a good conditioned, safe Anti-Gravitational Craft capable of reaching Ceres (and for that matter Titan & Pluto) in just a few hours or minutes, must come with a safe pair of Space Suits...No pilot needed i'm sure i'll get the hang of it

Might be out of my price range but with this I could head up there and prove it! mainly just confirmation for myself as i'm THAT sure! and no one else appears to think it's true?
Well I would rule out artifacts in which case what in the world could it be when this object can be seen in different areas of Ceres and then it's gone and moved to a different area! sometimes just a little further on, clever little artefact you

Oh and by Rover...I simply mean it looks like something which we would normally associate a rover to look like (like that BBC1 indent and the Mars Rover etc) this if proven? would be far larger than any rover we know of? and whilst roving over the Ceres surface it is more likely to take the form of mining craft?

PLEASE TAKE A LOOK...I just don't understand the artifacts statement when you put EVERYTHING together.

We are ONE DAY going to discover truly AMAZING things...things that even i'd be AMAZED & probably SHOCKED by, it will happen so long as we continue as a species so why not now?