Am I right about The FACE of PLUTO ?



All I know is that it LOOKS like such a thing & if proven to be so? then WHAT a STORY we have! it has a thin almost skeletal look to it, with cheekbones, pointed chin, sunken eyes & elongated bald head with a headdress (similar to those in EGYPT) & it also looks to have been placed on a SHOW Plinth
HUMAN? well it's very similar but the elongated head has a look of Akhenaten (Ancient EGYPTIAN Pharaoh) who has been described as looking very strange compared to other humans.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akhenaten

If NASA had the b...s to let us know (even if this NOT a face? this HAS been MADE!) then we could discuss it for IT is SOMETHING.

I have tried to estimate it's size from the ground to the top of it (skyward) & assuming this whole rocky outcrop does measure approx. 23 miles wide then it would appear to measure between 1-2 miles HIGH (How IMPRESSIVE would this be?)

I WOULD LOVE to SEE IT.

Who doesn't LOVE huge SCULPTURES? they're FUN, they're IMPRESSIVE & they are Interesting but i think if this is THE FACE OF PLUTO then i think we have a WINNER.

I visited SCOTLAND a few years ago & we saw 'THE KELPIES' close to FALKIRK...i would recommend a trip to see these wonderful sculptures of 2 Horses.

Those were nice but these are TRULY IMPRESSIVE...

Could these be something like this thing on PLUTO ?




394 feet & mighty impressive but this one on PLUTO would TOWER above it! we've got to GET SOME BETTER SHOTS OF THIS AMAZING THING!

This is LOVELY...look at those FIELDS! this setting! BEAUTIFUL.

I remember watching JASON & THE ARGONAUTS for the first time & being mesmerized by TALOS (the GIANT STATUE) who came to life, so as you can see such things really interest me & who can ever forget that shot near the end of "LORD of the RINGS : The Fellowship of the Ring" in which they took to that river & passed TWO huge STATUES either side of them!

TWO wondrous shots of General Guan Yu in CHINA (i wish China was within easy reach to visit)
Both different so clearly a figure of some importance.

And then we have this one which although smaller than that on PLUTO gives a closer impression of perhaps how this might look on that PLANET overlooking that enclosure below it...WOULD be IMPRESSIVE wouldn't it?



But if this someone on PLUTO? who is it? & what's the STORY behind them? i for one would like to know!

Well hoped you enjoyed looking at these...of course here in Britain we have a few others "The Angel of the North" is FUN.

The Buddha you see above is close to 400 feet high.

1 mile = 5,280 feet

So if this thing (I think it looks very much like a face & with that base & plinth then even if not this it's something) is say 1 mile then it would be some 13 x times the height of this BUDDHA above.

I think this Buddha is amazing & within a wonderful setting but can you imagine this looking down on you!

If it is NATURAL standing proud & alone with a number of shapes to it then it must be a truly unique natural structure created by PLUTO (but it's not uniform with the other structures & shapes & objects around it so surely it CANNOT be NATURAL?)

NASA are considering sending 2 missions back to this Dwarf Planet (DWARF who makes up these damn rules?) which to me SPEAKS VOLUMES & what's more they plan to land both of them there...one of them is a curious hope & skip mission (if I remember right?) the other is a PROPER LANDING THERE & surely THIS AREA has got to be the one in which they sit that spacecraft down near.

I would LAND this CRAFT on this right hand side FACING this THING (Face?) I don't suppose they could use a ROVER here (sadly) because if they could OH MY! all these things they could investigate & explore!

If NASA have these TOP SECRET Spacecraft that are capable of GREAT SPEEDS & that might get to the likes of PLUTO in hours or days then after receiving this photograph (if I were NASA chief) i'd already have a manned mission to get out there & investigate.

This is going to be one of those things that BUGS me for the REST of my LIFE...so frustrating when you know you can see so many things here that just do not look natural but NASA or anyone else seems to think so & I just don't understand it?