Well I was watching BBC1 recently when this older BBC1 Screen Identity LOGO was seen (they seem to be re-showing a lot of older screen idents these days on BBC1 and BBC2) showing this wonderful Moon Rover small film ident, no doubt they've had to save up for the Christmas one's we will be seeing soon? or will these again be the older one's

Anyway, here's the BBC1 Moon Rover short film...if your quick and you pause it at just 0:02 (2 seconds in) you'll get a good look at this Rover on the Moon and I could not help but smile as it has the look of what might be up there on CERES? a rover type i've been going on and on and on about...



See it's got an Oval shaped main body with the smaller circular centre which appears to have the engine and other gubbins inside it along with 8 rover wheels (4 on either side) UNCANNY!!!

Of course the one on CERES would be a mile bigger than this
So if that black surround around it were wheels of some type? then they are probably the biggest wheels this side of the Solar System

It is funny how this design is similar to the one I appear to have discovered on CERES...then again it might just be the biggest coincidence ever! and that ALL of those shots of that rover? craft? object? just do happen to look like such a thing? funny that huh? but then again perhaps the lovely Elizabeth Landau over at NASA who is the Press Officer for this DAWN MISSION is correct and they are just simply artafacts? if your reading this Hi Elizabeth and THANKS for the replies.

Should you ever read this Liz? then I think you know that simply by looking at them ALL I find it difficult to believe that should an occurrence has taken place...the odds of this occurring would perhaps be almost as big as finding aliens themselves? but I will have to live without really knowing I guess

I am NOT saying they're aliens! but if that's them up there on Ceres then that's some machinery and one hell of a Mining Operation? surely the likeliest option though? is that this is ours! due to the fact that we are probably way in advance of what we currently believe we are and are probably well capable of getting to such places out there quickly with amazing tech and machinery!

Surely we have that FREE Zero Point Energy? but no point in letting the whole World have it to help them....need to keep them in their place and paying for fossil fuel energy and the like for now
And as for Anti Gravity ships well surely we have these already? we probably got stuff that might take us to the stars by now if some are to be believed?

Like I said "The Human Adventure is just Beginning" but it would be nice if we could all begin sometime?

Oh and for those that would like to see the BRILLIANT full version of this BBC1 Moon Rover Ident complete with Launch & Touchdown...

Here it is...



ENJOY...and TRY to imagine one MANY MANY More TIMES this SIZE but on CERES

I do hope my previous comments did not seem too dismissive of you Elizabeth Landau over at NASA (should you ever read this) and i am truly sorry if it reads that way as I was truly delighted at getting a response back from you folks over at NASA with regards to this CERES issue but the 'Artifcacts' statement just seemed a little like a bog standard and somewhat rehearsed statement one might give to the general public, I mean if there was something in it? and to me I still maintain it looks strangely shaped like a rover that one might find on such a place? very similar i think to this one seen here on this BBC1 ident.

Well if so? how does one go about explaining this to folks back on Earth?

The implications are HUGE, so of course I knew it was highly unlikely I was going to get a "YEAH for SURE there's something on CERES"
Can't blame me for trying and i won't deny it would have been fantastic had you done so.

For if there is such a thing up there?...it will either be hushed up for reasons unknown? but I guess blindingly obvious, if ALIEN? that's amazing! and if HUMAN? again amazing! and then there's the why? what are they there for?

Of course such a thing would never be acknowledged to just one guy by way of e-mail and hey I am still open to the idea that I am wrong?

But again, here are the reasons why i do not believe them to be Artifacts...

1) So they were NOT removed from these photographs but others were? I find that strange.
And if somehow these are on the camera itself they would surely appear on each and every photograph taken hereafter? and in the same place? and yet recent photo's show nothing of the sort.

2) This object appearing as it does (oval / circular shaped with what appears to be a way of transporting itself around Ceres with a black surround) is strange enough but surely for an artefact from so many different photographs to show this same shaped / looking image is out of the question?
Artifacts tend to be different for each photograph taken...often streaks of light, pixalated blocks and the like.
This LOOKS LIKE A ROVER SHAPED OBJECT & that to me it is ODD and if a coincidence? then it's one BIG coincidence wouldn't you agree folks?

3) In a good many of these photographs in which this object can be seen it appears to have a purpose as it seems to be moving past areas on CERES such as craters and landmarks and the like...again very curious and strange! as if it were heading somewhere and up to something, in other words they don't seem random?

4) This object in a good number of these photographs does appear (at least to me) to have some dimensional depth to it and does not always seem to appear flat! in fact in some it actually appears to cast a shadow??? now please correct me if I am wrong? please anyone? but a photographic or camera artefact fault DOES NOT CAST SHADOWS right? certainly having checked I've never seen such a thing!

5) And whilst I still respect & will ALWAYS LOVE NASA they have simply made too many dismissive comments from other missions photographs and video evidence....the most famous of which by now many know such as "They are Ice Crystals" this one was NOT a clever one even and has bugged me for years, ice crystals just are not that big, they don't appear from nowhere with a flash of light and they cannot move and then stop by themselves so you can see as much as I love NASA (and I really do) I do question the things they say and so I do here with Ceres which if proven is HUGE NEWS!

Now if it can be proven they are artifacts? then I am open minded, I'm big enough to say I was wrong, I know it's a long shot that this is some strange huge rover type object on CERES but to this date I have no explanation that I have been happy with, so please someone let me know?
When you consider all the other strange things found on photographs and video (much of it official NASA) then you have to wonder is it so strange that such a thing is up there on CERES? I don't but I could be wrong? prove me wrong someone please or better still, if your in charge send me an e-mail let me know, i'll even keep quiet then PROMISE.

Just thought i'd show that thing/object/ROVER!!!! on CERES again here...what I find strange & even somewhat amusing in this photo is that the tracking? or wheels on the right hand side of this thing seem to be turning in as if to enter and go down into the crater and how much it appears to sit off the ground.
Very artefact looking isn't it




In this one you can see the hill/crater to the right and just below it is giving off a shadow to the left directly behind this Rover and you should also be able to see that this rover is also casting the very same shadow in the same direction and angle.

Now I don't know about you? but flat arifact error images DON'T cast shadows! and even if you can explain that away!
JUST LOOK AT THE SHAPE OF THIS THING!!!
WHAT are the chances such an error would show an object this defined, this shaped and this sized!
If you placed a Rover looking object upon Ceres it would look something like this!!! and the above BBC1 Rover which is somewhat similar.

If I am right and it is some form of vehicle (if as large I've estimated then it's quiet possible it could house thousands? but why would they choose to be stationed in this and upon on Ceres?) well it would be logical would it not? being on Ceres that it's some form of large mining operation vehicle.

Sorry I just don't buy the artifact reply...THIS IS SOMETHING! it means something! DAWN stayed in Orbit around Ceres! WHY? interesting though it is they must have got ALL the pictures they wanted and needed by now!

Oh and you folks will notice that this thing? object?

IT'S A ROVER! is in this second photograph facing in a totally different direction and in a different part of Ceres...funny that huh! and it's not a different looking artifact (aren't artifacts different each time?) but NO this one continues to look like a ROVER type and is travelling around CERES like it's up to something.

What I find very strange is this...

If it is something! why would NASA say it is not? of course they were never going to let little ol' me know! but why not? but instead come up with what I thought sounded like possibly a standard issue excuse that it's an artifact? which to me it clearly is NOT for the reasons I've given...take a LOOK and tell me this is an artifact camera or photographic error? and if so why do is show up sometimes but not in all the photographs...

THIS is STRANGE!

And why if they knew about this would they still release many of the Ceres Photographs showing this object when people (like me, curious types) would take an interest in what it was like up there on Ceres and there was a chance of finding this when zooming in on the pictures and seeing it in others even going past various craters as I've shown...DOES THAT NOT HIT YOU as STRANGE?

I think they FOUND something!

If I am wrong it's NO BIG deal but if I am right? then it's quiet a FIND and clearly has IMPLICATIONS! cue the "Capricorn One" film Theme Music